![john berger ways of seeing nearme john berger ways of seeing nearme](https://www.richardhollis.com/static/wp_content/waysofseeing_02.jpg)
The spectre of forgery chills the receptiveness-the will to believe-without which the experience of art cannot occur. They are impeccably destructive, tarring not only pretensions to taste but the credibility of taste in general. Unlike the subversive gestures of a Marcel Duchamp, say, his outrages will not become educational boilerplate in museums and universities. Lopez’s muckraking of van Meegeren scants a fact that Dolnick merrily exploits: the forger gratifies class resentment precisely because he is a pariah.
#John berger ways of seeing nearme professional
Its economic base is a club of the wealthy, who share power to impose or repress value with professional and academic élites. Art is unique among universally esteemed creative fields in its aloofness from a public audience. Thanks for bringing up that article, Mark! I think the whole last paragraph deserves quoting (emp mine):Īrt forgery is among the least despised of crimes, except by its victims-the identity of those victims being more than exculpatory, for many people.
#John berger ways of seeing nearme free
There was free beer, sure, but no artist’s statement, no postcards, nothing. I was with him and our wives at an opening in an art gallery in town last night and couldn’t get over how uncomfortable I felt about the whole thing. Our ideas about making art are very similar, but our business models couldn’t be more different! I’ve recently been going back and forth with an artist friend of mine about his fine-arts-based world (where his collectors value the original, one-of-a-kind) and mine (where there is no original, only reproductions, on the blog, in the book, etc).
![john berger ways of seeing nearme john berger ways of seeing nearme](https://artistsspace.org/media/pages/exhibitions/richard-hollis/650519929-1623172971/1zrDklmdnr.jpg)
The first essay is about art in the age of photography and reproduction, and is based on Walter Benjamin‘s essay, “ The Work of Art in The Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Benjamin’s idea was that in an era where an image can be easily reproduced, art might be “freed up” and become available to a mass audience. Amazing how much the contents remain valid in the age of the internet. Fantastic book based on the 1972 BBC miniseries, which someone has uploaded to Youtube, and I’ve assembled into one handy playlist for your viewing pleasure.